Watch the test live
A calm feed streams every navigation, request and test step.
Use cases · Web & API
Pentests that run continuously, with proof you can act on
Auth, sessions, business logic and customer-data paths, probed the way an attacker would.
Reproduced exploitExample
- RequestPATCH /v1/accounts/84
- Session reusedMember of another tenant
- Response 200Cross-tenant object returned
- ConfirmedReplay attached to the finding
Watch the test. Then replay the proof.
Confirmed, not guessed
Findings stay validating until an exploit reproduces. Confirmed means proven.
Auth, sessions & logic
Broken access control, IDOR, tenant isolation and logic flaws across real flows.
API-native coverage
REST and GraphQL endpoints are mapped, fuzzed and replayed with real payloads.
Browser, terminal, network
A live viewport shows the page, commands, traffic and artifacts.
Fixes, not just findings
Each confirmed bug opens a draft PR with the regression test.
Probe, prove, and hand off the fix
Point it at a target
Give Trident a URL or connect a repo. It maps routes and APIs.
Probe like an attacker
Auth, IDOR, injection, business logic and customer-data paths get exercised.
Reproduce the exploit
Findings are validated end to end and pinned with the exact request.
Open the fix
Confirmed findings hand engineers a draft PR with proof and a test.
Real exploits, not a wall of maybes
Without Trident
With Trident
Without TridentQuarterly pentests catch one point-in-time snapshot.
With TridentContinuous testing runs against every change you ship.
Without TridentScanners flag maybes you cannot reproduce.
With TridentFindings stay validating until an exploit reproduces end to end.
Without TridentReports are PDFs that age out on arrival.
With TridentEach finding ships the exact request to replay, plus a PR.
Without TridentBusiness logic and IDOR slip past automated tools.
With TridentAuth, access control and logic are exercised across real flows.
Without TridentTriage burns engineering time on guesswork.
With TridentEngineers receive validated, reachable issues with reproducible evidence.
Proof your team can close
Authorized scope
Web + API
Attached to findings
Evidence
Targeted retesting
Change-aware
After remediation
Retested
What a web and API engagement covers
Organized around the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide, weighted to the categories automation handled worst.
Test scope
Trident tests running web applications and APIs for the flaws scanners systematically miss: authorization that fails on one route but holds on its neighbour, business logic that can be driven into an invalid state, and data access that crosses a tenant boundary. Every reported finding is reproduced against the running system first.
- Authorization
- Object-level and function-level checks on every route, tested with identities from separate tenants and privilege levels. Single-account testing cannot reach this class.
- Authentication and session
- Token lifetime and revocation, session fixation, password reset and enrolment, multi-factor bypass, and whether logout invalidates anything server-side.
- Business logic
- Sequences that are individually valid and collectively wrong: skipped approvals, replayed idempotency keys, price manipulation, and state transitions the API accepts but the interface never offers.
- Injection and parsing
- SQL, command, template and deserialization handling, plus upload and parser behaviour, tested along the call paths the application actually exposes.
- Exposure of data
- Over-returning endpoints, verbose errors, unauthenticated debug and metrics routes, and responses carrying fields the interface never renders but a client can read.
Questions about scoping a web and API test
Is this a scan or a penetration test?
A penetration test. A scanner matches responses against signatures. Trident pursues an objective, adapts after failures, and must reproduce the result on the running system before reporting. Unconfirmed hypotheses do not become findings.
Do you need our source code?
No, but it materially improves coverage of authorization and business-logic flaws — exactly the categories worth paying for. Source-assisted engagements reach call paths black box testing finds only by luck.
Will testing break our environment?
Scope is enforced by the harness, not requested in a prompt: allowlisted targets, rate limits, non-destructive payloads, stop conditions. Most teams start on staging and extend to a constrained production scope later.
What happens after we fix something?
The original proof is replayed to confirm the fix, and adjacent call sites sharing the defect are tested too. Partial fixes — one route patched, three identical ones missed — are the normal case.
Stop shipping unproven risk.
Watch a Trident pentest reproduce a real exploit on your stack.
Point it at a URL. Nothing to install.